🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some individuals to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from the West, further countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers show that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.